Announcing Focus Change

It has now been over six months since I posted anything to this blog. There are several contributing factors for the hiatus, not the least being “POTUS 45 fatigue”. Most days, for the first month or so after posting Future Posting Plan on March 1st, I simply couldn’t get myself to even check the White House website.

I am still not interested in digging into all things POTUS 45 anymore. It is too depressing and feels counterproductive. Even though the last few months of general media coverage have been so fixated on the latest Tweet, the Mueller investigation, or the Supreme Court nominee hearings, etc., and so little coverage has been given to executive orders or significant actions of his staff, that I am sure several very important actions have gone unnoticed, I remain unmotivated to check on executive actions daily.

Instead, I’ve decided to resume posting, but with a shift in the focus of this blog. In my original About statement, I referred to possibly occasionally posting comments about our current political climate and culture. That, at least for now, is what interests me more, so I intend them to be the new focus. As before, my motivation may wax and wane, so I will not plan any systematic schedule of posts. In fact, I thoroughly expect to be sporadic, at best.

Over the last couple of years several organizations and groups have been working on better ways of exercising citizen rights and responsibilities. I’ve encountered a few interesting ideas that will probably be where I begin this new focus.


Qualcomm vs. Broadcom

The most significant executive order in quite some time was issued yesterday. From reading it (and what little I have heard about it in the media so far), this is an action I can fully support, as rare as that is with this POTUS!

The threat to national security is enormous if the takeover of Qualcomm by Broadcom was to occur. Having non-U.S. companies own near monopoly technologies that are essential to contemporary communication networks is not an acceptable reality.

It is very good that the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States issued its warning on March 4 so the threat would be taken seriously by this White House.

Official Title and Link:

Presidential Order Regarding the Proposed Takeover of Qualcomm Incorporated by Broadcom Limited

Executive Order issued March 12, 2018

Future Posting Plan

I’ve decided to change my regular posting pattern, at least for a while.

Beginning today, I will only post comments on (and links to) what I consider significant items. That will probably mean reporting on only some executive orders and perhaps some signing statements.

Routine items such as monthly proclamations will not meet the threshold of being “significant”.

For example, in the last week (since I last posted on February 21), nothing of significance has been signed. Routine recurring proclamations (such as March being Women’s History Month, in the case of the past week) can be seen by going to the White House Presidential Actions Archive.

Banning Bump Stocks?

Two memoranda appear on the White House website dated yesterday. One has received quite a bit of national news coverage, while the other is yet another routine delegation of authority. I’ll only comment on the somewhat controversial one.

Most media reports of the “bump stock” memorandum are overstating the result of the action. First, it is not an executive order, so is not a directive. Second, it does not ban bump stocks. It simply urges the Department of Justice to move expeditiously to finish the process begun late last year of addressing the legality of bump stocks under the legal definition of “machineguns”.

On December 26, 2017 in the Federal Register a Notice of Proposed Rule Making was published initiating the standard legal process for creating or changing a rule based on legislation. Note, it is not a proposed rule being issued for comment. It is notice of intent to create a proposed rule. (A notice of a plan to issue a proposed rule!) Talk about bureaucracy at its most cumbersome. I was well aware of the deliberative process for federal rule making that includes a public comment period on any new or modification of a rule, but did not know of this step.

At this point I’m too lazy to check into actual steps used in creating other rules to see if this is a convenient use of bureaucracy to slow down action on something this Justice Department does not really want to do in hopes it will eventually lose momentum enough to just go away, or if it is indeed part of the legal requirement for rule making. Either way, this presidential memorandum seems redundant at best and more likely just a publicity stunt, unless the Justice Department was going to just never get around to completing the proposed rule at all. I suppose given this Attorney General, one cannot rule out that possibility.

The closest the memorandum comes to any real presidential action, such as even endorsing a conclusion to make bump stocks illegal, is this statement – “…to propose for notice and comment a rule banning all devices that turn legal weapons into machineguns.” Proposing for notice is a long ways from actual banning or even a rule to effectively ban bump stocks by an expanded definition.

A careful reading of this memorandum leads to at least two possible conclusions of intent. One, the language appears to imply the president is eager to get the rule implemented to ban bump stocks. The other conclusion is, the lack of clarity in its wording that requires one to “read in implications” means this is just political cover for some later date having the rule development process conclude that bump stocks cannot be included in the legal definition of machine gun and therefore cannot be legally banned. At that point, POTUS 45 can then point to this memorandum as his “doing the best he could”.

I find even the timing of this memorandum to be suspicious. It appears to me to be a political act to make it look like the president is “doing something” about the recent school shooting in Florida that remains in the news daily. As far as I know, a bump stock was not used in the Florida shooting. One was used in the Las Vegas shooting last October, and that is when the whole idea of banning them began to be seriously considered publicly. So why this now?

If POTUS 45 was really interested in moving this process along, he would have issued this memorandum much earlier. The comment period following the December notice (referred to above) ended almost a month ago (January 25, 2018). If this action was a true priority, it would have been issued in late January. Even better, he would have submitted draft legislation to Congress to fix the law. That would make clear that change in the law is the best solution, because then it would not be left to the whim, ideology or priorities of future administrations who could make changes to the rules.

Ultimately, the practical reality is nothing in this order is actually accomplishing anything. Any future action on this particular issue is completely in the hands of the Justice Department. They will decide what the proposed rule will be. They will decide the timing of when to open the comment period for that proposed rule, and finally, they will decide on the eventual content of the final rule.

I suspect if any rule eventually is adopted, it will only be because banning bump stocks is purportedly supported by the NRA. I’m more skeptical about the most conservative members of Congress supporting this, as I think they remain opposed to anything that even remotely resembles gun control. If legislators really saw this as a priority, legislation would have passed already.

In the meantime I will wait cynically, and will be surprised if any new rule is in place before the 2018 elections.

Official Titles and Links:

Memoranda dated February 20, 2018

Catching Up

Life sometimes intervenes to delay my review of recent POTUS actions, but sometimes just plain disgust with the whole regime, including the GOP Congress and party as a whole, settles in and motivation to read, review, and comment is so diminished I just procrastinate. Example of procrastination: Today I finally got around to publishing a post I drafted a week ago, then forgot.

To catch up, here are the actions posted by the White House since February 8. I’m going to just list them for the record (in order of their appearance on that site) without comment, because I have only given them a cursory reading and they all appear to be more or less routine.

[Ed. Note: With this post, I have decided to create and use tags that are being used on the White House website. A while back, the site was redesigned and the two things I noticed immediately were: 1) tags to categorize the presidential actions, and 2) inclusion of “Nominations and Appointments” to their listings. The former might prove to be useful, the latter just clutters up the site. I would have preferred they added “Signing Statements” to this list instead, but so far they must still be found in a different place.]

Official Titles and Links:

  • Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense
  •  Presidential Message to the Congress of the United States
  •  Notice Regarding the Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to Libya
  •  Presidential Message to the Congress of the United States
  •  Presidential Sequestration Order for Fiscal Year 2019

Memoranda and Proclamation dated from February 9 through 15, 2018

Delegation to Defense

This appears to be yet another routine delegation of authority. Following is the operative section of the memorandum:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Director of National Intelligence, the functions and authorities vested in the President by section 1238 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115-91).

Official Title and Link: Presidential Memorandum on the Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities under Section 1238 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018

Memorandum dated February 5, 2018